International Journal of Environmental Protection          
An Open Access Journal
ISSN: 2226-6437(Print)      ISSN: 2224-7777(Online)
Frequency: Annually
Editorial-in-Chief: Prof. Kevin Mickus,
Missouri University of Science & Technology, USA.
Integration Techniques for Environmental Impact Assessment of Industrial Pollutants
Full Paper(PDF, 2600KB)
Abstract:
The integrated management of medium (both water and air) based pollutants is vital at current as the management and legalization of individual pollutant is very difficult. Various environmental aspects associated with the different medium during the production processes are major challenges being faced in the environmental management of industrial facilities. It is of vital concern today to find the scientific way of integration of medium-based pollutants. Based on an amount and kind of medium-based pollutants, Integrated Environmental Performance Score (IEPS) is calculated applying Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and other Environmental Impacts (TRACI). The potential impacts of individual pollutants have been modelled for water based pollutants viz., Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Total Phosphorous (TP), and Total Nitrogen (TN) and air pollutants viz., Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx), Oxides of Sulphur (SOx) and Particles Matter (PM10). A kilogram of individual pollutants is taken in modelling to compute the individual impact categories of unit pollutants. The EPS penalty of TN is obtained as highest score of 189.70 i.e. 90.82% shares among six pollutants. The total penalty score for TP, PM10, TN, NOx and SOx, is derived as 13.53 (6.48%), 2.59 (1.24%), 1.30 (0.62%), 1.30 (0.62%) and 0.44 (0.21%), respectively. Hence, it is necessary to integrate effects of pollutants as per the scientific and justified impact caused by individual pollutants derived from the industrial facilities. Therefore, this study recommends for the compliance of EPS penalty of the pollutants based on a result of TRACI. This helps to enforce a scientific and justified polluters’ pay principle.
Keywords:Integrated Environmental Performance Score; TRACI; Medium-based Pollutants; Total Penalty Score; Industrial Facilities
Author: Indira Parajuli1, Heekwan Lee1
1.School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Incheon National University 22012, 119, Academy Street, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea
References:
  1. Raya, I., V_azquez, V.L., “Sharing experiences to improve pollution prevention and control in the Mediterranean area,” Int. Innov. Res. Media Ltd., pp. 56-58, 2009.
  2. Daddi, T., De Giacomo, M.R., Rodríguez Lepe, G., V_azquez Calvo, L., Dils, E., Ellerman D. Phase 2 compliance of the acid rain program. MIT center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, 2003.
  3. Styles, D., O'Brien, K., Jones, M., “A quantitative integrated assessment of pollution prevention achieved by integrated pollution prevention and control licensing,” Environ. Int. vol. 35 (8), pp. 1177-1187, 2009.
  4. European Commission, “Directive (91/61/EC) concerning integrated pollution prevention and control", Official Journal L257 24/09/1996, 1996.
  5. Schoenberger, H., “Integrated pollution prevention and control in large industrial installations on the basis of best available techniques - the Sevilla Process,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 17 (16), pp. 1526-1529, 2009.
  6. European Commission Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth: http://ec.europa.eu/growthandjobs/ pdf/complet_en.pdf, 2010.
  7. Maria D. Lopez- Gamero, Enrique Claver- Cortes, Jose F. Molina- Azorin, “Evaluating environmental regulation in Spain using process control and preventive techniques,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 195, pp. 497-518, 2009.
  8. P.M. Bello Bugallo, L. Cristobal Andrade, A. Magan Iglesias, R.Torres lopez, “Integrated environmental permit through Best Available Techniques: evaluation of the fish and seafood canning industry,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 47, pp. 253-264, 2013.
  9. TRACI, Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts: User guide and system documentation. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), EPA/600/R-02/052, 2002.
  10. Ciambrone, D.F. Environmental Life Cycle Analysis. Lewis Publisher, New York, 1997.
  11. Life Cycle Assessment Inventory Guideline and Principles. B. W. Vigon, D.A. Tolle, B.W. Cornaby, and H.C. Latham Battelle- Columbus and C.L. Harrison, T. L. Boguski, R.G. Hunt, and J. D. Sellers Franklin Associates, Ltd. And USEPA Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, 1994.
  12. Lippiatt, B.C., Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability Technical Manual and User Guide (BEES 3.0). USEPA, Office of pollution prevention and Toxics, NIST, 2002.
  13. Kimmo Silvo, Matti Melanen, Antero honkasalo, Seppo Ruonala, Marianne Lindstrom. Integrated pollution prevention and control – the Finish approach, 2002.
  14. Clemens, B. and Douglas, T. “Does coercion drive firms to adopt voluntary green initiatives? Relationships among coercion, voluntary green initiatives and firm resources,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 59(4), pp. 491-500, 2006.
  15. Potoski, Matthew, and Aseem Prakash. “Regulatory Convergence in Nongovernmental Regimes: Cross-National Adoption of ISO 14001 Certification,” Journal of Politics, vol. 66(3), pp. 885-905, 2004a.
  16. German Giner Santonja, Pablo Aragones- Beltran, Joaquin Niclos – Ferragut, “The application of the analytic network process to the assessment of best available techniques,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 25, pp. 86-95, 2012.
  17. Burtraw, D., Evans, D.A., Krupnick, A., Palmer, K., Toth, R., “Economics of pollution trading for SO2 and NOx,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol. 30, pp. 253-289, 2005.
  18. Arimura, T., Hibiki, A., and Katayama, H., “Is a voluntary approach an effective environmental policy instruments? A case of environmental management systems,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 55, pp. 281-295, 2008.
  19. Gusmerotti N.M., Testa F., Amirante D., Frey M., “The role of negotiating tools in the environmental policy mix instruments: determinants and effects of Environmental Agreements’,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 35, pp. 39-49, 2012.